comp.lang.c++.moderated NewsGroup Archive: by date

Monday, 1 September 2003
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please Maciej Sobczak
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex James Dennett
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Walter
- Re: How does D compare to C++? llewelly
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Walter
- Trouble nesting template usage wglwill
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: Vector resize John Potter
- Re: Creating a template class based on Barton-Nackman trick johnchx
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? John Potter
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text John Potter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please johnchx
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex llewelly
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Nils Petter Vaskinn
- Re: command args processing lib(a la getopt), anyone? llewelly
- Re: Template classes and inline Adnan
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Attila Feher
- Re: Usiing nontype template parameters to customize allocators Attila Feher
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Walter
- Re: Overloading on nothrow Sergey P. Derevyago
- Re: Overloading on nothrow C0=CC=21?= Sergey P. Derevyago
- Re: compiletime template check Richard Corden
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Francis Glassborow
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: when an inline function doesn't inline, why doesn't compile give warning for multiple definition Francis Glassborow
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Francis Glassborow
- Re: Usiing nontype template parameters to customize allocators Richard Smith
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Agent Mulder
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Richard Smith
- Re: Type traits Richard Smith
- Re: Creating a template class based on Barton-Nackman trick Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Trouble nesting template usage llewelly
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex llewelly
- Re: Type traits Dhruv
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Usiing nontype template parameters to customize allocators Dhruv
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Dhruv
- Re: Template classes and inline Agent Mulder
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code sashan
- Re: command args processing lib(a la getopt), anyone? E. Robert Tisdale
- (help)any free refactoring tool for c++ Tabrez Iqbal
- Re: command args processing lib(a la getopt), anyone? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Trouble nesting template usage Richard Smith
- Re: How does D compare to C++? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please Richard Smith
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Implementing an interator on an odd collection kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: when an inline function doesn't inline, why doesn't compile give warning for multiple definition Andrey Tarasevich
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Initialisation of local static variables; details kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Dave Harris
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Ben Hutchings
- banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Kymert persson
- nested threads in C++ Wilser Ramirez
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please llewelly
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Anand Ramalingam
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Walter
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Walter
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Ed Avis
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Roland Pibinger
- Re: Template member functions Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
Tuesday, 2 September 2003
- Re: RegEx Proposal Beman Dawes
- typeof or autotype ? Thomas Thiriez
- Re: Template classes and inline llewelly
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: variations on boost::function Frank Longo
- Re: is it possible see compiler modified code in C++ Walter
- Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries Glen Low
- Re: Template classes and inline Manas
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Francis Glassborow
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Francis Glassborow
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Greg P.
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Attila Feher
- Re: nested threads in C++ Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Francis Glassborow
- Re: For loop compilation optimization Sean Fraley
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Shay
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Francis Glassborow
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Attila Feher
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Attila Feher
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Hendrik Schober
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Richard Smith
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Attila Feher
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: (help)any free refactoring tool for c++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: Usiing nontype template parameters to customize allocators Attila Feher
- Re: command args processing lib(a la getopt), anyone? Ben Hutchings
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Agent Mulder
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Jerry Feldman
- Re: Initialisation of local static variables; details Ben Hutchings
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code stelios xanthakis
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please llewelly
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Hendrik Schober
- visual C++ .net how to get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ runing? Thomas
- Re: Pre-standardizing hash_map & friends. Early Ehlinger
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Kevin Cline
- Re: Template classes and inline Early Ehlinger
- Re: Help Needed: C/C++ Standard Libraries Early Ehlinger
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Richard Smith
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration Kevin Cline
- Re: Template member functions johnchx
- Re: Overloading on nothrowC0=CC=21?= Bob Bell
- Re: Overloading on nothrow Bob Bell
Wednesday, 3 September 2003
- Re: typeof or autotype ? johnchx
- universal factory Bronek Kozicki
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries llewelly
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code James Kanze
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Agent Mulder
- Where can I find Coplien's "Curiously Recurring Template" C++ Report Article Pat Thomson
- Consequences of ill-formed program Ron
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Early Ehlinger
- Re: Proposal for declaring methods final (not to be overridden) Ron
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Niklas Borson
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Early Ehlinger
- Re: visual C++ .net how to get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ runing? Greg P.
- C Standard as part of C++ Dave Theese
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- atomic operations nedeltcho
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Siemel Naran
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: (help)any free refactoring tool for c++ llewelly
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Stefan Heinzmann
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Francis Glassborow
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration Aaron Bentley
- Re: visual C++ .net how to get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ runing? Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Function template overload resolution Joerg Walter
- Re: Template classes and inline Francis Glassborow
- Re: visual C++ .net how to get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ runing? Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Francis Glassborow
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration apm
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Francis Glassborow
- Re: visual C++ .net how to get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ runing? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Pre-standardizing hash_map & friends. Jacek Generowicz
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Francis Glassborow
- Re: Please recommend a sophomore level C++ text Francis Glassborow
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Template classes and inline kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Template classes and inline kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: C Standard as part of C++ Attila Feher
- Re: atomic operations Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Attila Feher
- Re: atomic operations Attila Feher
- Re: atomic operations Francis Glassborow
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: universal factory Attila Feher
- Re: Where can I find Coplien's "Curiously Recurring Template" C++ Report Article Attila Feher
- Re: Proposal for declaring methods final (not to be overridden) Francis Glassborow
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Risto Lankinen
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: command args processing lib(a la getopt), anyone? apm
- Re: POD: Succinct and definitive, please Richard Smith
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Hendrik Schober
- Re: C Standard as part of C++ Richard Smith
- Re: (help)any free refactoring tool for c++ Alexander Jasper
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Richard Smith
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Stefan Heinzmann
- Re: atomic operations White Wolf
- stl - cast - vector kwijibo28
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code White Wolf
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ White Wolf
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Dave Harris
- Re: How does D compare to C++? David Bradley
- Re: visual C++ .net how to get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ runing? Early Ehlinger
- Re: Template member functions Ben Hutchings
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries johnchx
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Thant Tessman
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Richard Smith
- Re: universal factory Bronek Kozicki
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: C Standard as part of C++ llewelly
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration llewelly
- Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class Jianlin Chang
- Templates, et. al MPowell
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ llewelly
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: atomic operations Richard Smith
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Ed Avis
- Re: Help Needed: C/C++ Standard Libraries Randy Maddox
- Re: atomic operations Ben Hutchings
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Richard Smith
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Ben Hutchings
- Re: C Standard as part of C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries tom_usenet
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Gregory Pakosz
Thursday, 4 September 2003
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: stl - cast - vector John Potter
- Re: atomic operations Ron
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Ron Natalie
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: stl - cast - vector Ulrich Eckhardt
- destructors for static and non static pointer-to-objects gorda
- Re: stl - cast - vector Ben Hutchings
- SmallObject and Singleton woes John Dill
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Daniel Frey
- Re: stl - cast - vector Graham Batty
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Roland Pibinger
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Igor Ivanov
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries Glen Low
- Re: stl - cast - vector llewelly
- Re: D complex vs C++'s std::complex Niklas Borson
- Re: atomic operations llewelly
- How My App Can Detect What Program Is Active When My App Is Not?????? Tony D.
- Re: How does D compare to C++? llewelly
- Re: stl - cast - vector Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ John Potter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ John Potter
- IDE for C++ David
- Re: atomic operations nedeltcho
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Francis Glassborow
- Re: universal factory Aaron Bentley
- Re: stl - cast - vector Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: universal factory Attila Feher
- Re: stl - cast - vector Attila Feher
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class Attila Feher
- Re: stl - cast - vector Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: atomic operations Siemel Naran
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Siemel Naran
- Re: stl - cast - vector Siemel Naran
- Re: Where can I find Coplien's "Curiously Recurring Template" C++ Report Article Siemel Naran
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Siemel Naran
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class Siemel Naran
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration apm
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: destructors for static and non static pointer-to-objects Thomas Richter
- dependent type and typename question Pavel Vozenilek
- Re: Reasons for single entry, single exit Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Daniel Frey
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Daniel James
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program llewelly
- Re: command args processing lib(a la getopt), anyone? llewelly
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Anthony Williams
- Re: destructors for static and non static pointer-to-objects Ben Hutchings
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class Ben Hutchings
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Daniel Spangenberg
Friday, 5 September 2003
- Re: atomic operations Joe Seigh
- Re: How My App Can Detect What Program Is Active When My App Is Not?????? Ben Hutchings
- Re: atomic operations Thomas Richter
- Is C++ a dying tongue? Matthew Wilson
- Re: How My App Can Detect What Program Is Active When My App Is Not?????? Thomas Richter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: IDE for C++ Thomas Richter
- Re: Exception handling speed Alexander Terekhov
- Re: IDE for C++ Jerry Feldman
- Re: How does D compare to C++? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: atomic operations Pete Becker
- Re: How does D compare to C++? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: destructors for static and non static pointer-to-objects Aaron Bentley
- Re: auto_impl class I use \
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: universal factory Richard Smith
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: stl - cast - vector Ivan Vecerina
- Re: IDE for C++ Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: IDE for C++ Greg P.
- Re: IDE for C++ Tarjei Knapstad
- Re: IDE for C++ llewelly
- Re: universal factory Bronek Kozicki
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrei Alexandrescu
- g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: SmallObject and Singleton woes Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: atomic operations Joshua Lehrer
- Re: typeof or autotype ? llewelly
- Re: destructors for static and non static pointer-to-objects llewelly
- Re: atomic operations Simon Turner
- Re: destructors for static and non static pointer-to-objects Thomas Tutone
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? apm
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Ron Natalie
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Implicit function pointers Dave Theese
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? beta64_at_yahoo.com
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Christos Dimitrakakis
- Re: dependent type and typename question Matthew Wilson
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards llewelly
- Static methods of a class as inlines ? Amit Bhatia
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using the class Pete Becker
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: atomic operations Ben Hutchings
- Re: dependent type and typename question johnchx
- Re: typeof or autotype ? Early Ehlinger
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Siemel Naran
- Re: atomic operations Pete Becker
- Re: Does adding new methods to a class require recompliation of application using Dave Harris
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: IDE for C++ sashan
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ llewelly
- Inheritance of virtual methods. Amit Bhatia
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Sam Holden
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Consequences of ill-formed program Francis Glassborow
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? coder_1024
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Dhruv
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Vadim Ferderer
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: auto_impl class I use Richard Smith
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Hendrik Schober
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code stelios xanthakis
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hendrik Schober
- std::vector and memory management Stephan Brönnimann
- Re: The "smart guarantee"? Rob Williscroft
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards tom_usenet
- Re: Inclusion guards Early Ehlinger
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Same variable name. Isaac Rodriguez
- Re: Inclusion guards Attila Feher
- Re: dependent type and typename question kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: atomic operations kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Early Ehlinger
- Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Daniel
- Re: atomic operations kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
Saturday, 6 September 2003
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Daniel Frey
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: Implicit function pointers Ben Hutchings
- Re: dependent type and typename question Daveed Vandevoorde
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? llewelly
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries Daveed Vandevoorde
- Re: Where can I find Coplien's "Curiously Recurring Template" C++ Report Article Daveed Vandevoorde
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
- Re: universal factory White Wolf
- Re: SmallObject and Singleton woes John Dill
- auto_ptr Question Bob Bell
- socket connection problem Jeff Crouse
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ John G Harris
- Re: universal factory Bronek Kozicki
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Torsten Robitzki
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Jason Carucci
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: atomic operations White Wolf
- Re: universal factory Bronek Kozicki
- Re: How My App Can Detect What Program Is Active When My App Is Not?????? Peter Roozemaal
- Re: IDE for C++ Peter Roozemaal
- Re: IDE for C++ smitty_one_each
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Joshua Lehrer
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Dave Harris
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ John Potter
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration llewelly
- Re: Reasons for single entry, single exit llewelly
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration Matthew Wilson
- Re: dependent type and typename question Richard Smith
- Re: dependent type and typename question llewelly
- Re: banning profane language in C++ source code Balog Pal
- Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? David Turner
- Re: IDE for C++ Greg P.
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Greg P.
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Ben Hutchings
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Balog Pal
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Attila Feher
- Re: Reasons for single entry, single exit Balog Pal
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Agile Programming / XP in C++ Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Same variable name. sashan
- Re: Inclusion guards Joe Gottman
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Jack Klein
- Re: atomic operations Shay
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Shay
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Shay
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards John L Fjellstad
- Re: The "smart guarantee"? David B. Held
- Re: Inheritance of virtual methods. atha
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Same variable name. Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: socket connection problem Francis Glassborow
- Re: socket connection problem Rob Williscroft
- [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? stelios xanthakis
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Ralph Peterson
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Aaron Bentley
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Jerry Feldman
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Thant Tessman
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Brian McKeever
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators P.J. Plauger
Sunday, 7 September 2003
- Re: auto_ptr Question Dhruv
- Re: atomic operations Joe Seigh
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Dave Harris
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Dave Harris
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Dave Harris
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Inclusion guards Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Alexander Terekhov
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration Ulrich Eckhardt
- how do i create a ostringstream with pre-allocated memory buffer Paul Woods
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ White Wolf
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards White Wolf
- Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) Bohdan Kushnir
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: std::vector and memory management Paavo Helde
- Re: Static methods of a class as inlines ? Paavo Helde
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? llewelly
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Vadim Ferderer
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Ivan Vecerina
- explicit template specialization in mingw/g++ kig
- Re: socket connection problem Robb
- "frame memory" malapropism? Matthew Wilson
- Nondependent name lookup in base classes Omer Tunali
- Re: Static methods of a class as inlines ? Charles Burns
- Re: socket connection problem Charles Burns
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Edward Diener
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Dhruv
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? White Wolf
- Re: socket connection problem Kevin Goodsell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Francis Glassborow
- Re: auto_ptr Question Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Jim Janney
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Jim Janney
- How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Ivan
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hans-J. Boehm
- How to test at compile time whether a class implements a particular function? Ivan
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom apm
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: Nondependent name lookup in base classes Maciej Sobczak
- Re: socket connection problem Rob Williscroft
- Re: Extending the functionality of built-in types Balog Pal
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Francis Glassborow
- Re: "frame memory" malapropism? Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Christos Dimitrakakis
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards John L Fjellstad
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Ideas for a midterm and final projects Jerry Feldman
- Re: universal factory Torsten Robitzki
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Daniel Frey
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Torsten Robitzki
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Daniel
- Re: auto_ptr Question Shane Beasley
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ John Potter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Ralph Peterson
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: "frame memory" malapropism? John Potter
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Dave Harris
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Dave Harris
- Re: Nondependent name lookup in base classes Glen Low
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Pete Becker
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards llewelly
- Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) Bohdan Kushnir
- Re: auto_ptr Question Bob Bell
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Edward Diener
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? John Potter
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Thant Tessman
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: socket connection problem Jeff Crouse
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ White Wolf
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom White Wolf
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? White Wolf
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Nondependent name lookup in base classes johnchx
- Re: "frame memory" malapropism? Alexandre Cossette
- Re: Inclusion guards Ben Liddicott
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Raoul Gough
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Jack Klein
Monday, 8 September 2003
- Re: Ideas for a midterm and final projects Francis Glassborow
- Re: Inclusion guards Raoul Gough
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Daniel
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? James Rogers
- Re: socket connection problem Roger Orr
- Re: explicit template specialization in mingw/g++ johnchx
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Dave Harris
- Re: Nondependent name lookup in base classes Omer Tunali
- Re: Ideas for a midterm and final projects llewelly
- Re: "frame memory" malapropism? llewelly
- Re: explicit template specialization in mingw/g++ llewelly
- Re: g009: The header file (for a class) shall contain the class declaration llewelly
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? llewelly
- Question about template error message James W. Walker
- Re: Overloading on nothrow Sergey P. Derevyago
- Re: Overloading on nothrow Randy Maddox
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hans-J. Boehm
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Carl Barron
- [ANNOUNCE] e4Graph 1.0a9 Jacob Levy
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Jack Klein
- Re: std::vector and memory management johnchx
- Re: atomic operations Arnold Hendriks
- Specialization of member function template fails to compile MikeB
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hendrik Schober
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Daniel
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hendrik Schober
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hendrik Schober
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Reasons for single entry, single exit Hendrik Schober
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Dave Harris
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Mirek Fidler
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? Falk Tannhäuser
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Michiel Salters
- Re: auto_ptr Question Ron Natalie
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Ideas for a midterm and final projects Jerry Feldman
- Re: Same variable name. Ron Natalie
- Re: explicit template specialization in mingw/g++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: std::vector and memory management Ron Natalie
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Mike Capp
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Steve Toledo-Brown
- Re: std::vector and memory management Stephan Brönnimann
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? stelios xanthakis
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: socket connection problem Richard Smith
- Re: Inclusion guards Attila Feher
- Re: atomic operations Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Dave Harris
- Re: Static methods of a class as inlines ? Thomas Richter
- Re: Inheritance of virtual methods. Thomas Richter
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Anthony Williams
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards llewelly
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) Ron Natalie
- Re: std::vector and memory management Ron Natalie
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Ron Natalie
- Re: socket connection problem kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Nils Petter Vaskinn
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Why isn't there a monetary value type in std-c++-lib? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Function templates vs inheritance Daniel
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? stelios xanthakis
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Ivan
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Dave Harris
- Re: atomic operations Ben Hutchings
Tuesday, 9 September 2003
- Re: Static methods of a class as inlines ? Ben Hutchings
- why does destructor initialize vfptr? Stephen Vavasis
- Re: Question about template error message Richard Smith
- Re: Question about template error message Falk Tannhäuser
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Specialization of member function template fails to compile llewelly
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Stephen M. Webb
- Re: explicit template specialization in mingw/g++ llewelly
- Re: Specialization of member function template fails to compile Thomas Tutone
- Re: Specialization of member function template fails to compile Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ llewelly
- Re: Specialization of member function template fails to compile Ben Hutchings
- Re: Question about template error message Ben Hutchings
- Re: Specialization of member function template fails to compile Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Creating a template class based on Barton-Nackman trick Daveed Vandevoorde
- Re: Usiing nontype template parameters to customize allocators Anonymous
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ John G Harris
- Re: Question about template error message Jack Hanebach
- Re: Question about template error message Rob Williscroft
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: atomic operations Alexander Terekhov
- codecvt for converting between character encodings Frank Wiener
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code Shannon Barber
- Re: Usiing nontype template parameters to customize allocators Anonymous
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) Ron Natalie
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Tito Villalobos
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ llewelly
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Shane Beasley
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Allan Odgaard
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards David Abrahams
- Re: Overloading on nothrow D=21?= Sergey P. Derevyago
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Keith Thompson
- Re: Overloading on nothrow C0=CC=21?= Sergey P. Derevyago
- Re: Nondependent name lookup in base classes johnchx
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Alexander Terekhov
- Re: how do i create a ostringstream with pre-allocated memory buffer Siemel Naran
- Re: std::vector and memory management Siemel Naran
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrea Griffini
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: std::vector and memory management Peter Dimov
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? George van den Driessche
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Ron Natalie
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? tom_usenet
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Antoun Kanawati
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Richard Smith
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Ben Hutchings
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Early Ehlinger
- Read/write to same file > once John G.
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Nils Petter Vaskinn
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Alf P. Steinbach
- powerpoint slides for C++ class? Gabriel Zachmann
- Re: Function templates vs inheritance MikeB
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Harald Lüßen
- Re: atomic operations kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Function templates vs inheritance Siemel Naran
- Re: Function templates vs inheritance Ben Hutchings
- Compile error using Function Adapters Michael Jørgensen
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Getting work done between certain time in C++ Johnny Sandaire
- Re: Function template overload resolution Patrick Kowalzick
- Re: Function templates vs inheritance Richard Smith
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Hendrik Schober
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Daniel
- Re: Function templates vs inheritance Daniel
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Peter van Merkerk
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? llewelly
- Re: Reasons for single entry, single exit Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Daniel
- Re: The "smart guarantee"? Rob Williscroft
- Re: Question about template error message James W. Walker
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Specialization on nothrow Sergey P. Derevyago
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Ron
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Early Ehlinger
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ Steve Folly
- Re: Creating a template class based on Barton-Nackman trick johnchx
- Re: Compile error using Function Adapters llewelly
- Re: Specialization of member function template fails to compile MikeB
- using auto_ptr with a struct Bill Burris
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Early Ehlinger
- Re: Read/write to same file > once Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Pavel Vozenilek
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Francis Glassborow
- Re: Function template overload resolution Ron Natalie
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ Ron Natalie
- Re: std::vector and memory management llewelly
- Re: why does destructor initialize vfptr? Dave Harris
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Dave Harris
- Re: universal factory Ron
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Tom Hines
Wednesday, 10 September 2003
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ Kai Ruhnau
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
- Re: How My App Can Detect What Program Is Active When My App Is Not?????? Ben Liddicott
- Re: universal factory Ben Liddicott
- Re: Read/write to same file > once Kai Ruhnau
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ Ron Natalie
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Ron Natalie
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: universal factory Torsten Robitzki
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ llewelly
- Re: Compile error using Function Adapters Maciej Sobczak
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ llewelly
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Raoul Gough
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Allan Odgaard
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Matthew Collett
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Balog Pal
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Balog Pal
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Balog Pal
- Re: How does D compare to C++? llewelly
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Aaron Bentley
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Shay
- Template function overloading vs. specialization Dave Theese
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Carl Daniel
- Re: how do i create a ostringstream with pre-allocated memory buffer Paul Woods
- Re: powerpoint slides for C++ class? llewelly
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Compile error using Function Adapters Michael JÃ¸rgensen
- Re: The "smart guarantee"? David B. Held
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Francis Glassborow
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Attila Feher
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Raoul Gough
- Re: how do i create a ostringstream with pre-allocated memory buffer Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Function template overload resolution Joerg Walter
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Thomas Maeder
- Re: Function template overload resolution Joerg Walter
- Re: std::vector and memory management kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Read/write to same file > once John G.
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct rishi
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: universal factory Bronek Kozicki
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Read/write to same file > once kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Accessing protected static member function of base Sabyasachi Basu
- Re: Function template overload resolution Patrick Kowalzick
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Hendrik Schober
- stl list greater deodiaus
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards David Abrahams
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards David Abrahams
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards David Abrahams
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: std::vector and memory management Stephan Brönnimann
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Ron Natalie
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Balog Pal
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Anthony Williams
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Hendrik Schober
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? stelios xanthakis
- Re: STLport vector class & custom allocators Peter Dimov
- Re: std::vector and memory management Peter Dimov
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Bill Burris
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Nemanja Trifunovic
- Re: Read/write to same file > once Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? White Wolf
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Ross Smith
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? White Wolf
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Ed Avis
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ White Wolf
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ White Wolf
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: Ideas for a midterm and final projects Ramiro
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Igor Ivanov
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Dave Harris
- include tree analysis Steve Toledo-Brown
- Re: Read/write to same file > once John G.
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards llewelly
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ llewelly
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: std::vector and memory management johnchx
- Re: universal factory Ben Liddicott
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ John Potter
- to readers of comp.lang.c++.moderated comp.lang.c++.moderated moderator
Thursday, 11 September 2003
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Dietmar Kuehl
- vector Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Bill Burris
- Re: std::vector and memory management John Potter
- Re: Compile error using Function Adapters Ali Cehreli
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries Glen Low
- Re: Read/write to same file > once Ali Cehreli
- Inline functions/methods and the one definition rule. Kevin Frey
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ White Wolf
- Re: The "smart guarantee"? David Abrahams
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) John Potter
- Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Johnny Sandaire
- Re: Getting work done between certain time in C++ Johnny Sandaire
- [Comparative performance] Argument passing (built-in types) Alex Vinokur
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? Siemel Naran
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrei Alexandrescu
- function templates & default parameters Matt Trentini
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Uwe Schnitker
- Re: include tree analysis Andreas Scherer
- sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Uwe Schnitker
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrea Griffini
- Re: stl list greater Carlos Moreno
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Mirek Fidler
- Re: std::vector and memory management kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Visitors and MixIn-s Radu Grigore
- expor usage Radu Grigore
- Re: Read/write to same file > once kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: Is it legal ? ( changing default param values ) kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: std::vector and memory management Stephan Brönnimann
- Re: Read/write to same file > once John G.
- typedef linkage Saul
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Hendrik Schober
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Marco Manfredini
- Re: vector Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Matthew Collett
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) simone f
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: include tree analysis Gareth Stockwell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Andrew Koenig
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Attila Feher
- Re: [Comparative performance] Argument passing (built-in types) Michael Jørgensen
- Re: vector Re: using auto_ptr with a struct Carl Daniel
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Carl Daniel
- Problem using static member of template class... Sylvain
- Re: include tree analysis Ira Baxter
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Antoun Kanawati
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Ron Natalie
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Michiel Salters
- Re: Inline functions/methods and the one definition rule. Ben Hutchings
- Re: Inline functions/methods and the one definition rule. Michiel Salters
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Ben Liddicott
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Jonathan H Lundquist
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Nemanja Trifunovic
- Re: using auto_ptr with a struct \
Friday, 12 September 2003
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Shimshon Duvdevan
- Re: function templates & default parameters johnchx
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Hendrik Schober
- ANN: Commercial support for Loki now available Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ John Potter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ John Potter
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Todd Johnson
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Allan Odgaard
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Vladimir Kouznetsov
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Carl Daniel
- Re: function templates & default parameters Siemel Naran
- Re: typedef linkage Siemel Naran
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Shay
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Jack Klein
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries johnchx
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Uwe Schnitker
- Re: typedef linkage kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? David Turner
- Re: std::vector and memory management P.J. Plauger
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) llewelly
- Re: Your basic koenig lookup; lifetime of temporaries llewelly
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Ziv Caspi
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Ziv Caspi
- Re: How to test whether an expression is a compile time constant? Attila Feher
- Seeking design pattern.. Søren Johansen
- Re: expor usage Attila Feher
- Re: typedef linkage Attila Feher
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Attila Feher
- Re: function templates & default parameters Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: function templates & default parameters Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Andrea Griffini
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Attila Feher
- Re: std::vector and memory management Peter Dimov
- Class Derived from std::exception. Isaac Rodriguez
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Jean-Marc Bourguet
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Ron Natalie
- Re: stl list greater deodiaus
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Carl Daniel
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Jonathan H Lundquist
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Jonathan H Lundquist
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? White Wolf
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Bob Bell
Saturday, 13 September 2003
- Re: include tree analysis Roland Pibinger
- Re: [Comparative performance] Argument passing (built-in types) Alex Vinokur
- Re: typedef linkage Saul
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Hans-J. Boehm
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Ron Natalie
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? Siemel Naran
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) Ron Natalie
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Roland Pibinger
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Thomas Tutone
- Re: stl list greater wogston
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Ulrich Eckhardt
- Compile error using Function Adapters Michael Jørgensen
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Jim Nance
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ John Potter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Ross Smith
- Re: expor usage Siemel Naran
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Siemel Naran
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Radu Grigore
- Re: function templates & default parameters llewelly
- Re: sizeof(int*) vs sizeof(int) llewelly
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Using longjmp in c++ MikeB
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Shay
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Graeme Prentice
- Re: expor usage Greg Comeau
- Re: include tree analysis Dave Harris
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Dave Harris
- Re: universal factory Aaron Bentley
- Re: stl list greater Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- inserting class objects into maps Kieth
- Bug with std::queue? PhilipG
- stringstream (binary) performance problem Remo Eichenberger
- get max of two constant ints as const-expr - without macro? manfred
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Drew Hall
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Allan Odgaard
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Ed Avis
- Re: Agile Programming / XP in C++ Ed Avis
- Is *this an lvalue? Matthias Hofmann
- Re: inserting class objects into maps David B. Held
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? White Wolf
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? John Potter
- Re: inserting class objects into maps bernd
- Re: get max of two constant ints as const-expr - without macro? White Wolf
- Re: stringstream (binary) performance problem White Wolf
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: inserting class objects into maps White Wolf
- Re: include tree analysis Michael Tiomkin
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code White Wolf
- Re: inserting class objects into maps Derek Ledbetter
Sunday, 14 September 2003
- Re: function templates & default parameters llewelly
- Re: How does D compare to C++? llewelly
- Re: How does D compare to C++? llewelly
- Re: Using longjmp in c++ llewelly
- Re: stringstream (binary) performance problem Stephen Howe
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: stringstream (binary) performance problem Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: include tree analysis Roland Pibinger
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Dave Harris
- Re: include tree analysis Roland Pibinger
- Re: Using longjmp in c++ Dave Harris
- Re: get max of two constant ints as const-expr - without macro? Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: Bug with std::queue? PhilipG
- Re: include tree analysis Francis Glassborow
- Re: stringstream (binary) performance problem Francis Glassborow
- Re: function templates & default parameters johnchx
- Re: include tree analysis Aaron Bentley
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Allan Odgaard
- Re: Using longjmp in c++ Antoun Kanawati
- Re: Seeking design pattern.. Ivan Vecerina
Monday, 15 September 2003
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: include tree analysis Michael Tiomkin
- Re: RegEx Proposal Allan Odgaard
- typedef decalrations Andrew Chalk
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Fun with ptr_fun Glen Low
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Nicolas Fleury
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: [Comparative performance] Argument passing (built-in types) Michael Jørgensen
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? David Turner
- Re: Using longjmp in c++ Thomas Richter
- Re: the shoes we wear Marco Manfredini
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: include tree analysis Dave Harris
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: typedef decalrations Russell Hanneken
- Re: typedef decalrations Attila Feher
- Re: typedef decalrations Ivan Vecerina
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Ivan Vecerina
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: typedef decalrations Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Gabriel Dos Reis
- compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Arun Kumar
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Glen Low
- Re: typedef decalrations Ben Hutchings
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? stelios xanthakis
- Re: typedef decalrations Dhruv
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Mirek Fidler
- Re: Seeking design pattern.. Ben Hutchings
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: typedef decalrations Marco Manfredini
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Ben Hutchings
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Ben Hutchings
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Early Ehlinger
- Library for Symbol Table F. Schaefer
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: include tree analysis kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Johnny Sandaire
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Grzegorz Jakacki
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom White Wolf
- Re: typedef decalrations Dan McLeran
- static and virtual Eric W
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Bo Persson
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Thomas Tutone
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Ron Natalie
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Dave L. Delaney
- Re: RegEx Proposal Beman Dawes
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ llewelly
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Jack Klein
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Allan Odgaard
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Dave Harris
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
Tuesday, 16 September 2003
- const and non-const iterators in const member functions John W. Wilkinson
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Siemel Naran
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings Aaron Bentley
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Daniel Pfeffer
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Graeme Prentice
- Re: typedef decalrations Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Missing set operations Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Ben Hutchings
- Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Alex Vinokur
- Re: static and virtual Risto Lankinen
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Lorenzo Bettini
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Hannah Schroeter
- Re: typedef decalrations Attila Feher
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Jim Nance
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: static and virtual JarlOstensen
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Falk Tannhäuser
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Daniel Pfeffer
- Specialized class template out-of-line members: template<>? David Turner
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Falk Tannhäuser
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
Wednesday, 17 September 2003
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: RegEx Proposal Allan Odgaard
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Siemel Naran
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Problem using static member of template class... Guy Harrison
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards David Abrahams
- Re: Seeking design pattern.. Mirek Fidler
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Werner Salomon
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Marco Manfredini
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code White Wolf
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Todd Johnson
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Shay
- Re: static and virtual White Wolf
- Re: stringstream (binary) performance problem Remo Eichenberger
- problems with std::messages Björn Sachsenberg
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Hans-J. Boehm
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions John W. Wilkinson
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? John Potter
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: static and virtual Jon Heiner
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Jon Heiner
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? llewelly
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom White Wolf
- Re: static and virtual Eric W
- Re: Overloading template parameters Matt Messina
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? White Wolf
- Re: IDE for C++ thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- stl algorithms Kykza
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Michael Jørgensen
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? Allan Odgaard
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Missing set operations Siemel Naran
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Siemel Naran
- Re: function templates & default parameters Matt Trentini
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Tom Houlder
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Falk Tannhäuser
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Nils Petter Vaskinn
- MPOOL'03 -- Final Call for Papers MPOOL'03 Organizers
- Re: Specialized class template out-of-line members: template<>? David B. Held
- Re: typedef linkage Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: wrapping a stream interface Samuel Krempp
- Re: static and virtual Risto Lankinen
- Re: stl algorithms Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: wrapping a stream interface Aaron Bentley
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: wrapping a stream interface Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: stl algorithms Samuel Krempp
- Re: static and virtual kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Julian Smith
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Ben Hutchings
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- could if/else avoid syntax checking compile time unreachable code? stuart macgregor
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Mirek Fidler
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Specialized class template out-of-line members: template<>? Greg Comeau
- Re: RegEx Proposal Beman Dawes
- Re: Fun with ptr_fun Wil Evers
- Re: IDE for C++ David B. Held
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Bob Jenkins
- Re: stl algorithms Dan McLeran
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Grzegorz Jakacki
- Re: Overloading template parameters White Wolf
- Re: static and virtual Jon Heiner
Thursday, 18 September 2003
- Re: wrapping a stream interface Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: problems with std::messages Dietmar Kuehl
- virtual destructor question Stephen Vavasis
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Graeme Prentice
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom White Wolf
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Early Ehlinger
- Re: static and virtual White Wolf
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom White Wolf
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code White Wolf
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? White Wolf
- Re: banning non-neutral language in C++ source code Tim Rowe
- Re: could if/else avoid syntax checking compile time unreachable code? Tim Rowe
- Thread safe strings? Samuel Jackson
- Failed Instantiation Gene Wirchenko
- Re: static and virtual Eric W
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings Aaron Bentley
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Aaron Bentley
- problem in constructors in implementing String ADT class OlgaM
- Re: could if/else avoid syntax checking compile time unreachable code? Jack Klein
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: stl algorithms Glen Low
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Missing set operations Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: g007: banning profane language in C++ source code apm
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom apm
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Falk Tannhäuser
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Alan Griffiths
- Re: problems with std::messages P.J. Plauger
Friday, 19 September 2003
- Re: function templates & default parameters Ben Hutchings
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Daniel Pfeffer
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: virtual destructor question Ben Hutchings
- Nested Namespaces Michael D. Borghardt
- Re: Thread safe strings? Ben Hutchings
- Re: could if/else avoid syntax checking compile time unreachable code? Gene Wirchenko
- Loki Singleton Lifetime policy obsolete? John Dill
- jjLibrary Ver1.6 Fumisky Wells
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- Re: Failed Instantiation Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Thread safe strings? Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Thread safe strings? Jakob Bieling
- Re: problem in constructors in implementing String ADT class Francis Glassborow
- Re: virtual destructor question Francis Glassborow
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ André Pönitz
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Ken Hagan
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Alex Vinokur
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Failed Instantiation \
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Re: Specialized class template out-of-line members: template<>? Attila Feher
- Re: wrapping a stream interface Attila Feher
- Re: Failed Instantiation Attila Feher
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: problem in constructors in implementing String ADT class Richard Smith
- numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) Google Poster
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Failed Instantiation Richard Smith
- Re: wrapping a stream interface kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: virtual destructor question Ron Natalie
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings Ben Hutchings
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Using STLPort compiling problems Koutsi
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom apm
- Re: Failed Instantiation Ben Hutchings
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom llewelly
- Re: typedef linkage kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Thread safe strings? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: static and virtual stelios xanthakis
- Re: Protecting or hiding a username and password in C++ Jim Melton
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom apm
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Radu Grigore
- Re: Failed Instantiation Aaron Bentley
- Re: problem in constructors in implementing String ADT class Hyman Rosen
- Re: Failed Instantiation Daniel Anderson
- When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Aaron Bentley
- gratuitous class member functions??? Bud Curtis
- Re: Failed Instantiation John Potter
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Agent Mulder
- Re: Failed Instantiation Hyman Rosen
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? Siemel Naran
- Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Generic Usenet Account
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Siemel Naran
- Re: problems with std::messages Siemel Naran
- Re: problem in constructors in implementing String ADT class Attila Feher
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) P.J. Plauger
- Re: Using STLPort compiling problems Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: typedef linkage Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Nested Namespaces Richard Smith
- Re: function templates & default parameters Attila Feher
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Order of initialization of facets, Was: Re: problems with std::messages kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Attila Feher
- Re: Nested Namespaces Francis Glassborow
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Nils Petter Vaskinn
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Francis Glassborow
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Andrea Griffini
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: function templates & default parameters Ben Hutchings
- Re: gratuitous class member functions??? Ben Hutchings
- STL-like Skiplist template? Bryan Turner
- Re: stl algorithms fa
- Re: virtual destructor question Ben Hutchings
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Tom Houlder
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Samuel Krempp
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Ben Hutchings
Saturday, 20 September 2003
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- Re: Order of initialization of facets, Was: Re: problems with std::messages Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Julián Albo
- Re: compiling difference b/w G++ and VC++ Ron Natalie
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Phil Carmody
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Marcin Vorbrodt
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Shay
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Mike Wahler
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Big Brian
- Re: gratuitous class member functions??? David B. Held
- Re: function templates & default parameters johnchx
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Larry Evans
- Re: function templates & default parameters White Wolf
- Re: problems with std::messages Björn Sachsenberg
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? White Wolf
- Re: function templates & default parameters johnchx
- Re: Nested Namespaces White Wolf
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator johnchx
- std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Joshua Lehrer
- Re: RegEx Proposal Eric Niebler
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Michael Tiomkin
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Problem with getline Tarali Dunn
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Balog Pal
- Re: Missing set operations John Potter
- Re: STL-like Skiplist template? John Potter
- Re: Order of initialization of facets, Was: Re: problems with std::messages P.J. Plauger
- Re: Ternary search tree (string_map) implementation; comments? Allan Odgaard
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Graeme Prentice
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) apm
- bug in MSVC71 ? Bronek Kozicki
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: Nested Namespaces Francis Glassborow
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Francis Glassborow
- ciao cia io_at_io.it
- Re: Problem with getline John Potter
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) WW
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Gabriel Dos Reis
Sunday, 21 September 2003
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Aaron Bentley
- Cannot invoke a templated ctor Momchil Velikov
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Siemel Naran
- Re: Nested Namespaces Siemel Naran
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Siemel Naran
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Aaron Bentley
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Ralf Schneeweiß
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Eric Niebler
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Siemel Naran
- Re: Missing set operations Siemel Naran
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: How does D compare to C++? David Abrahams
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: bug in MSVC71 ? Gianni Mariani
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Papers on garbage collection in C++ ? Ed Avis
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Ben Liddicott
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? WW
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Shane Beasley
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Shane Beasley
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Ed Avis
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Ed Avis
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Ed Avis
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrea Griffini
- problem with Koenig lookup ? Bronek Kozicki
- Re: could if/else avoid syntax checking compile time unreachable code? Ed Avis
- Re: IDE for C++ Harold Howe
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? James Kanze
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings James Kanze
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
Monday, 22 September 2003
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Aaron Bentley
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: gratuitous class member functions??? Bud Curtis
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: Thread safe strings? James Kanze
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Carl Barron
- Re: Missing set operations John Potter
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) James Kanze
- Re: const and non-const iterators in const member functions Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Tom Houlder
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Ralf Schneeweiß
- Re: Loki Singleton Lifetime policy obsolete? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Re: Order of initialization of facets, Was: Re: problems with std::messages James Kanze
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Bronek Kozicki
- Re: stl algorithms Shane Beasley
- Re: function templates & default parameters Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Order of initialization of facets, Was: Re: problems with std::messages James Kanze
- Re: RegEx Proposal Andy Heninger
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Daniel Pfeffer
- Re: Missing set operations Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- book C++ for beginners Eduardo Suarez
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Lorenzo Bettini
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: [RFC] Auto functions: an interesting feature? Dave Harris
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Dave Harris
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Dave Harris
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Tim Rowe
- Re: Visitors and MixIn-s Grzegorz Jakacki
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Simon Turner
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Herb Sutter
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Markus Werle
- Re: gratuitous class member functions??? Francis Glassborow
- Re: numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) Google Poster
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: gratuitous class member functions??? David B. Held
- CRTP with virtuals Grzegorz Jakacki
- Member function call on incomplete type Grzegorz Jakacki
- EDG Bug? Joshua Lehrer
- Re: codecvt for converting between character encodings John G Harris
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? David B. Held
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Bronek Kozicki
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Igor Ivanov
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- ANN: Recycling allocator Felix Yen
- Re: Loki Singleton Lifetime policy obsolete? John Dill
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Torsten Robitzki
- Re: How does D compare to C++? David Abrahams
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Emil Dotchevski
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Torsten Robitzki
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? WW
- Re: book C++ for beginners Francis Glassborow
- Re: Member function call on incomplete type Ron Natalie
Tuesday, 23 September 2003
- Re: wrapping a stream interface James Kanze
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Joshua Lehrer
- File Handling in C++ ...Arrays aejaz
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Balog Pal
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Pete Becker
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Chris Newton
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Joshua Lehrer
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? johnchx
- Re: numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) P.J. Plauger
- Re: numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom apm
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards apm
- Re: numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN(), min and max (MSVC) Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: File Handling in C++ ...Arrays Dirk Feytons
- Re: When does 10 * 7.7 == 76? Roger Willcocks
- Re: gratuitous class member functions??? Dhruv
- Re: stl algorithms Ben Liddicott
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Shane Beasley
- Re: Loki Singleton Lifetime policy obsolete? Nicola Musatti
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
Wednesday, 24 September 2003
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Nicola Musatti
- Re: File Handling in C++ ...Arrays Sylvain
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? llewelly.at_at_xmission.dot.com
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Agent Mulder
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? David B. Held
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: stl algorithms Pete Becker
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Emil Dotchevski
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Limited typeof [ was Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction ] Joel de Guzman
- Re: Loki Singleton Lifetime policy obsolete? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Is array element be constant expression z k h
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Singleton in a multithreaded app Jeremy Godfrey
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Hyman Rosen
- forward declaration and typedef Wouter Genuit
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Aaron Bentley
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Siemel Naran
- Re: File Handling in C++ ...Arrays Francis Glassborow
- How to determinate the aligned size for a type in C++ Beta Jin
- Dangers of overloading global new and delete? Uwe Schnitker
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Alan Griffiths
- lazy copy Radu Grigore
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Francis Glassborow
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Peter Dimov
- Re: Limited typeof [ was Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction ] Joel de Guzman
- Re: Cannot invoke a templated ctor Graeme Prentice
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Alexander Terekhov
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Francis Glassborow
- Re: forward declaration and typedef Attila Feher
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? Attila Feher
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? WW
- static data members access Alexander Mahr
- Re: forward declaration and typedef Dimitris Kamenopoulos
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? WW
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- strange behaviour of STL destructor Mookie
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? tom_usenet
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Balog Pal
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Dave Harris
- Re: forward declaration and typedef David B. Held
- So You Think You Know C++ David Barto
- Re: Is array element be constant expression Artie Gold
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Andrei Alexandrescu \(See Website For Email\)
- Re: Is array element be constant expression Andrea Griffini
- Re: Loki Singleton Lifetime policy obsolete? John Dill
- Re: Limited typeof [ was Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction ] Joshua Lehrer
- Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query Simon G Best
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Joshua Lehrer
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Dave Harris
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Hyman Rosen
- returning protected baseclass enum from derivedclass func manfred
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Hyman Rosen
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator johnchx
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Torsten Robitzki
Thursday, 25 September 2003
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrea Griffini
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Erik Max Francis
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Tim Rowe
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Andrei Alexandrescu
- Inline assembler Walter
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query johnchx
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.performance group? llewelly.at_at_xmission.dot.com
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Siemel Naran
- Re: forward declaration and typedef Siemel Naran
- Re: Naming convention for accessor methods (get/set) Aaron Bentley
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Glen Low
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? johnchx
- Re: How to determinate the aligned size for a type in C++ Glen Low
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: How to determinate the aligned size for a type in C++ Ron Natalie
- Solution to "cannot instantiate abstract class due to following members"? Jonathan Browns
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Necessity in comp.lang.c++.portability group? Michael Jørgensen
- Re: forward declaration and typedef Michael Jørgensen
- Re: static data members access Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Heinz Ozwirk
- member functions in STL algorithms Anton Sodja
- Re: Can we measure it? Nicola Musatti
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Attila Feher
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Dhruv
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Gareth Stockwell
- Re: How to determinate the aligned size for a type in C++ Attila Feher
- Re: static data members access Gerhard Menzl
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? mjm
- brackets issue specifying ::*s Phil Carmody
- Re: File Handling in C++ ...Arrays Attila Feher
- Re: Can we measure it? Nicola Musatti
- Template with C linkage errors -- please help Jack Mackrel
- simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * archi
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor John Potter
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Francis Glassborow
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Francis Glassborow
- Re: static data members access Francis Glassborow
- Re: wrapping a stream interface kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Gerhard Menzl
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Tonci Tomic
- Re: static data members access Tonci Tomic
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query Markus Werle
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Robert Klemme
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Daveed Vandevoorde
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.portability group? Lorenzo Bettini
- Re: wrapping a stream interface kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Nicola Musatti
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Early Ehlinger
- Template class with template baseclass with member template miclin
- Re: g010: Inclusion guards Early Ehlinger
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Joe Seigh
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query Simon G Best
- Re: Solution to "cannot instantiate abstract class due to following members"? Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Tonci Tomic
- Re: member functions in STL algorithms Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: static data members access Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Radu Grigore
- Re: bug in MSVC71 ? Jeff F
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: stl algorithms kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: static data members access Gareth Stockwell
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Markus Werle
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Nemanja Trifunovic
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom WW
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Peter Dimov
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Carl Daniel
- Re: Can we measure it? WW
- Re: forward declaration and typedef Dave Harris
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Bob Bell
- Re: Solution to "cannot instantiate abstract class due to following members"? Ron
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- [ANN] macstl 0.1.3, the C++ source library Glen Low
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Inline assembler WW
Friday, 26 September 2003
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction David Abrahams
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator johnchx
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Jon Heiner
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app WW
- Re: Template class with template baseclass with member template George Cristea
- Re: Dangers of overloading global new and delete? Jon Heiner
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ WW
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Alexander Terekhov
- Re: returning protected baseclass enum from derivedclass func WW
- protected data Emily Winch
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * P.J. Plauger
- Re: Necessity in comp.lang.c++.portability group? WW
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Ian
- Re: How does D compare to C++? David Abrahams
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- online current STL manual Philip
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator John Potter
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Aaron Bentley
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? John Potter
- are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query Simon G Best
- Re: bug in MSVC71 ? Ron Natalie
- Re: static and virtual Balog Pal
- Re: static and virtual Balog Pal
- Re: static and virtual Balog Pal
- Design By Contract Michael D. Borghardt
- Re: static and virtual Balog Pal
- Re: [ANN] macstl 0.1.3, the C++ source library Andrei Alexandrescu \(See Website For Email\)
- Re: Inline assembler Walter
- Strange switch loop. Chris Schumacher
- Re: Template class with template baseclass with member template johnchx
- Re: Template class with template baseclass with member template Hyman Rosen
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Siemel Naran
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Siemel Naran
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Siemel Naran
- Re: member functions in STL algorithms Siemel Naran
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Siemel Naran
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Siemel Naran
- Re: Template class with template baseclass with member template Siemel Naran
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? David B. Held
- Re: Template with C linkage errors -- please help Attila Feher
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? johnchx
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * archi
- Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Katja Casutt
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Walter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * Thomas Mang
- Re: Template class with template baseclass with member template Thomas Mang
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Thomas Mang
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: protected data Anthony Williams
- Re: protected data Francis Glassborow
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Francis Glassborow
- Re: static and virtual Francis Glassborow
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Attila Feher
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Joe Seigh
Saturday, 27 September 2003
- Re: Can we measure it? Nicola Musatti
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrea Griffini
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Hyman Rosen
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ David Abrahams
- Problem using Boost Graph Library ialexei
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Mookie
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Tom Hyer
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer tom_usenet
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: online current STL manual Ron Natalie
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query johnchx
- Re: book C++ for beginners Andrew Koenig
- Re: online current STL manual J. W. Peterson
- Re: protected data WW
- Re: protected data Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Marcelo Pinto
- Re: Design By Contract WW
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? E. Mark Ping
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Raoul Gough
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Ron
- Re: returning protected baseclass enum from derivedclass func Ron
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Getting the minimum value for a data type Adam H. Peterson
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Maciej Sobczak
- const T specialization Michael v. Szombathely
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Dilip
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- Re: Inline assembler Jerry Feldman
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: How does D compare to C++? David Abrahams
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Thorsten Ottosen
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Design By Contract Marcelo Pinto
- Re: Missing set operations John Potter
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * John Potter
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Dirk Feytons
- Re: [ANN] macstl 0.1.3, the C++ source library Glen Low
- Re: Design By Contract Siemel Naran
- Re: protected data Siemel Naran
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Siemel Naran
- Re: Strange switch loop. Siemel Naran
- Re: Strange switch loop. Dhruv
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: [ANN] macstl 0.1.3, the C++ source library Glen Low
- Visual C++ Products... Michael J. Reeves, AA, ASc
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Rob
- Re: Strange switch loop. Jakob Bieling
- Re: Strange switch loop. Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Francis Glassborow
- Re: Strange switch loop. Francis Glassborow
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Francis Glassborow
- JPEG/setjmp always fails St?phane Vaxelaire
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Inline assembler WW
- Re: Problem using Boost Graph Library David Abrahams
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Can we measure it? WW
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
- Re: Strange switch loop. Jakob Bieling
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ John Potter
- Re: wrapping a stream interface James Kanze
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Strange switch loop. James Kanze
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Design By Contract James Kanze
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? John Potter
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: protected data James Kanze
- Re: Getting the minimum value for a data type Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Balog Pal
- Re: static and virtual Balog Pal
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
- Re: static and virtual Balog Pal
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ron Natalie
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Ron Natalie
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator John Potter
- Re: protected data Ron Natalie
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrea Griffini
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Dhruv
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: simple thing: from vector<complex<double> > to complex<double> * P.J. Plauger
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Bob Bell
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Pavel Vozenilek
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Rogers
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Greg Comeau
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? WW
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Aaron Bentley
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Francis Glassborow
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Aaron Bentley
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
- Re: Inline assembler Walter
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Chris Newton
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Glen Low
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Nikolai Borissov
- Re: online current STL manual WW
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Eugene Alterman
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: protected data Emily Winch
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query Simon G Best
Sunday, 28 September 2003
- Re: JPEG/setjmp always fails Jack Klein
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Edward Diener
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Bob Bell
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Matthew Collett
- Re: Inline assembler WW
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Allan Odgaard
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Stefan Heinzmann
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? WW
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ WW
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Edward Diener
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Jakob Bieling
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Dilip
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Balog Pal
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Joshua Lehrer
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? James Kanze
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ James Kanze
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Balog Pal
- Re: protected data Siemel Naran
- Re: Strange switch loop. Siemel Naran
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Greg Comeau
- Return code Matthew Peavy
- Re: Inline assembler Walter
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ Walter
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Class Template Member Class Template Specialisaton Query johnchx
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Aaron Bentley
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrea Griffini
- Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Julian Raschke
- Templates Jakob Reuter
- Re: const T specialization Siemel Naran
- Re: Strange switch loop. Siemel Naran
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Siemel Naran
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator johnchx
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Eric Niebler
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ David Abrahams
- Forward declaration of nested classes. Alan McKenney
- Re: Strange switch loop. Agent Mulder
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Le Chaud Lapin
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? John Potter
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator John Potter
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Walter
- this used in base member initialiser list. Andrew Maclean
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ John Potter
- Re: online current STL manual J. W. Peterson
Monday, 29 September 2003
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. David B. Held
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Raoul Gough
- Re: Return code Jack Klein
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Gerhard Menzl
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Balog Pal
- Re: online current STL manual Paolo Carlini
- Re: Strange switch loop. Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: How does D compare to C++? Andrea Griffini
- Re: Return code Francis Glassborow
- Re: Strange switch loop. Dhruv
- Re: Strange switch loop. Francis Glassborow
- Re: const T specialization Richard Corden
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: Singleton in a multithreaded app Raoul Gough
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement David B. Held
- Re: Strange switch loop. Matthew Collett
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. David B. Held
- Re: Templates Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Return code Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: Templates Sebastian Kapfer
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Getting the minimum value for a data type Attila Feher
- Re: online current STL manual Attila Feher
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Emlyn Corrin
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Attila Feher
- Re: Return code Peter Roozemaal
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Attila Feher
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Attila Feher
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? Ed Avis
- Re: Can we measure it? Martin Slater
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Jeff F
- Re: Return code Jerry Feldman
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Anthony Williams
- Re: Return code Jerry Feldman
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Jeff F
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Attila Feher
- Re: const T specialization Momchil Velikov
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Attila Feher
- Re: Return code Attila Feher
- Re: Templates Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: std::pair<>::operator+ template deduction Andrei Alexandrescu \(See Website For Email\)
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Greg Comeau
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Early Ehlinger
- Re: protected data Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Thomas Tutone
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? Peter Dimov
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Dhruv
- Re: bug in MSVC71 ? Ralf Schneeweiß
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Anders J. Munch
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Ron Natalie
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Ron Natalie
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Antoun Kanawati
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? James Dennett
- Re: Inline assembler WW
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ David Barto
- Re: Forward declaration of nested classes. Jonathan Mcdougall
- Re: Strange switch loop. Don Pratt
- Re: How to determinate the aligned size for a type in C++ Antoun Kanawati
- Re: strange behaviour of STL destructor Antoun Kanawati
- Re: protected data Shay
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Ron
- Relational queries using STL (was: Library/component design and implementation in C++) Ed Avis
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Maciej Sobczak
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Ron
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Pete Becker
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Gabriel Dos Reis
Tuesday, 30 September 2003
- Template class .. Porting C to C++ Michele
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Siemel Naran
- Nuff said Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? John Potter
- Re: Forward declaration of nested classes. Siemel Naran
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: Can we measure it? WW
- Re: ANN: Recycling allocator Felix Yen
- Re: Getting the minimum value for a data type David Abrahams
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ David Abrahams
- Re: Design By Contract Michael D. Borghardt
- Re: Can we measure it? Balog Pal
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Balog Pal
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ [repost] David Abrahams
- Re: Inline assembler Walter
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Walter
- Re: How to determinate the aligned size for a type in C++ Shay
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Shay
- Re: are static objects zero-initialized w/o initializer Graeme Prentice
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Glen Low
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Derek Ledbetter
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? WW
- Re: Return code Jack Klein
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Thorsten Ottosen
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Shannon Barber
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Shannon Barber
- Re: Class Derived from std::exception. Aaron Bentley
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: Return code Attila Feher
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Strange switch loop. Tim Rowe
- Re: So You Think You Know HUMOR Daniel Frey
- Re: Getting the minimum value for a data type Attila Feher
- Re: Inline assembler Attila Feher
- Re: Nuff said Attila Feher
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Anthony Williams
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Francis Glassborow
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Attila Feher
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Julian Raschke
- Re: Return code Attila Feher
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Julian Raschke
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Raoul Gough
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Attila Feher
- Re: Design by Contract in D and C++ [repost] Tim Rowe
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Raoul Gough
- Re: Getting the minimum value for a data type Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Relational queries using STL (was: Library/component design and implementation in C++) Joaqu?n M? L?pez Mu?oz
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Redefinition Of Variable Permiited In If Statement Attila Feher
- Re: Call a constructor within a constructor of the same class Ingolf Steinbach
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Walter
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? David B. Held
- Re: Design By Contract Adam H. Peterson
- Re: Anonymous Blocks - Why aren't they there? Dave Harris
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? David B. Held
- Re: Nuff said Stefan Heinzmann
- Re: Type assignable to dereferenced output iterator Eugene Gershnik
- Re: wrapping a stream interface John Dill
- Re: Return code kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- hash map ..deletion issue sameer
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: Is *this an lvalue? thp_at_cs.ucr.edu
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: problem with Koenig lookup ? johnchx
- Re: Library/component design and implementation in C++ kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
- Re: [Comparative performance] Argument passing (built-in types) Alex Vinokur
- Re: Getting the minimum value for a data type Daniel Spangenberg
- Re: bug in MSVC71 ? Francis Glassborow
- Re: g008: arranging files as source/header pairs and the pimpl idiom Alan Griffiths
- Re: Is C++ a dying tongue? Balog Pal
- Re: Return code John L Fjellstad
- Re: So You Think You Know C++ Dietmar Kuehl
- Re: this used in base member initialiser list. Dietmar Kuehl

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:24:35 PDT
Archived on: Fri Oct 24 2008 - 19:59:04 PDT